In October I went to the movies! I saw The Magnificent Seven, which was a nice wrap-up for the summer, and now it's November already and the season of Oscar hopefuls is starting! Lots of movies this month, and lots that look really good! Which ones have your attention?
Doctor Strange
Nov 3rd; PG-13
Benedict Cumberbatch takes his turn as Marvel hero as the Marvel universe officially expands into the realm of magic. I'm expecting good things. This movie doesn't have the kind of hype that surrounds some Marvel films like sequels and team-ups, but I always look forward to the introduction films and what they'll bring to the table that's new. And Doctor Strange more than most seems to be coming from its own place and is (as of yet) unconnected with the rest of Marvel. The trailers look good and promise plenty of weirdness, and Cumberbatch appears to be in fine form as the new hero. He's joined by Tilda Swinton, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Mads Mikkelsen and Rachel McAdams, and positive reviews are already flooding in. I have no doubt this movie will be good; it's just a matter of how good at this point. I hope it'll be spectacular, but even if it isn't, it should certainly be a worthy addition all the same -- and a definite must-see!
Loving
Nov 3rd; PG-13
My favorite director returns again with a second film for 2016! Well, I just said it, so it must be true; Jeff Nichols is my favorite director. So far he's been batting a thousand, with four beautifully brilliant and strikingly different films under his belt, and everything seems to indicate that Loving will be right at home along with them. It stars Joel Edgerton and Ruth Negga as the historic interracial couple Richard and Mildred Loving who fought the system over their marriage in the 60's. Nichols' staple, Michael Shannon is there also, and Nick Kroll and Marton Csokas. Normally, I have diminished interest in based-on-true-story films, especially if they're straight dramas, so I can see this being my least favorite from Nichols, but even if that's the case, it's still just as likely to be as beautifully and excellently made.
Arrival
Nov 10th; PG-13
Did I just watch a trailer for a political alien movie? At the very least Arrival seems to be exploring the realistic technical aspects of a hypothetical alien contact. Maybe like in the way The Martian did for surviving on a different planet. How would the government react? Who would be brought in to handle things? What kind of obstacles would need to be overcome and how would it be done? And then of course you throw in the question of whether the alien's intentions are good or bad, and you have a pretty neat idea for a movie! And based on the early reviews, they've pulled it off. Amy Adams stars -- who I'm currently feeling "meh" towards, but I know she capable of good things -- along with Jeremy Renner (always a plus) and Forest Whitaker. I'm always down for sci-fi, but I really want this one to be as great as it wants and appears to be.
Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them
Nov 17th; PG-13
Okay, I'm not much of a Harry Potter fan. Never read them; watched the films through and enjoyed them. Just so you know where I'm coming from here. This new spin-off does look like fun; set in the same universe, but apparently very separate from Harry's adventures. Eddie Redmayne is being all quirky and odd and is using magic a lot in the trailer which is great, and I like the tone of the trailer too. Mature, like the later Potter films, but also very focused on being fun. I heard it's the beginning of a new Potter-World series, and I just hope it doesn't turn into eight more movies. The idea of investing in a whole new string of films isn't appealing to me at my level of interest, but if this movie delivers and can stand on it's own, I'd be happy to watch it!
Manchester by the Sea
Nov 17th (limited); R
I don't have much to say about this one. It's rating will keep me out of the theaters for it even if I were that interested anyway. But I just really love all that all the critically acclaimed film are coming out now, and the critics are gushing over this one. So I thought the trailer was worth sharing.
Nocturnal Animals
Nov 17th (limited); R
Now this is the kind of character I'd really love to see Amy Adams play. Dark, and possibly sinister. And man, this film has a cast! There's also Jake Gyllenhaal, Michael Shannon, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Isla Fisher (Amy's look-alike!), Armie Hammer, and Laura Linney! The movie will probably have to be cut before I'll watch it, but it looks like my kind of film. Moody, mysterious and noir-ish. It's based on a book, so I'll have to look into that too.
Bleed For This
Nov 17th; R
Miles Teller bulks up to star in this based-on-a-true-story sports drama as a boxer who works through a devastating injury from a car crash to be able to fight again. Aaron Eckhart costars as his trainer. Sports movies aren't typically my things, but fighting sports do have an edge over other kinds. I would probably be very interested in this if it weren't for the rating, and how it comes through in the trailer -- that is, unnecessarily. These are the earmarks of a movie that is only decent, because not enough effort and devotion was put into making it great.
The Take (Bastille Day)
Nov 17th (limited); R
Idris Elba. Richard Madden. British action movie. Enough said, I think! This doesn't look like a huge caliber action film or anything, but it's the sort of movie that I'd want to watch no matter how bad it is and then live with the regret if I must. Another iffy rating, but I'll be keeping an eye out.
Rules Don't Apply
Nov 22nd; PG-13
I liked Alden Ehrenreich in Hail, Caesar! so much that I might be interested in this movie even if he wasn't the new Han Solo, but honestly this movie's plot looks like garbage. As another pilot of the Millennium Falcon would say. Here he co-stars with Lily Collins while she plays a aspiring actress in 1950's Hollywood. Romance and drama ensues.
Lion
Nov 24th (limited); NR
Probably won't be able to make it to the level of Slumdog Millionaire, which it will probably be compared to considering the drama and Dev Patel in the lead, but it sure is an interesting original idea for a story! An Indian boy lost as a kid is adopted by an Australian couple, and 25 years later, he sets out on the nearly impossible task of finding his home and family again.
Showing posts with label Aaron Eckhart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Aaron Eckhart. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 1, 2016
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Upcoming Movie Roundup - March
February was another slow movie month for me. I still want to see P&P&Z, and Hail, Caesar! -- plus Eddie the Eagle which I missed when doing my last Upcoming Movie post, but have taken notice of since -- but I haven't gotten to the theater for any of them, and will probably just end up waiting. But maybe not, because March doesn't have any must-see-in-theater flicks either (as far as I can tell), though it does have quite a few that land in the same "really want to see at some point" category that the previously mentioned three are waiting in.
Which March movies look interesting to you?
London Has Fallen
Mar 4th; R
Aaron Eckhart and Gerard Butler return as the President of the United Stated and his loyal bodyguard who saved his life in the last film and is gonna do it again. But it London. With higher stakes, I assume. I caught Olympus Has Fallen on TV a while back, and enjoyed it pretty well. Though I thought it was pretty bad, it had a violent, serious appeal, and it was certainly better than White House Down with much more likable leads and its more hardcore vibe. So I wouldn't mind catching this one too someday.
Zootopia
Mar 4th; PG
It's not like I don't want to see this one, but right now I'm super tired of the trailers getting everywhere. Animated Disney movie trailers are seriously the worst things ever. They make this movie look so annoying and are probably giving away all the jokes too. However I have learned to not judge a Disney animation by its trailer, and all the extremely positive reviews coming in are much more convincing that this one may just be a gem. But the sloth jokes are driving me crazy.
The Divergent Series: Allegiant
Mar 18th; PG-13
Uuuuhhhhhh. Is it worth mentioning that Insurgent was so boring that I was basically done with this series as soon as I saw it? First of all, Allegiant was the worst book of the series, and I don't care to see it end on screen. There's no enjoyment for me there, unless some huge changes are made. Secondly, this isn't even the end, because (that's right!) the last book is split into two movies! Yaayyyy... Except no Part1/Part2, now there's an "Ascendant" to look forward to. I'm not saying I'll never see this one or the last one. There is after all, the matter of my curiosity and my favorite character Peter. But seeing it in the theater is a long shot. Almost as a long a shot as this movie breaking the pattern and being a truly good movie!
Midnight Special
Mar 18th; PG-13
I seem to find one every month. One movie that I know noting about but the cast makes me immediately want to see it. This time it's this sci-fi film that want to be like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and the interesting cast is Adam Driver and (his great uncle in the Star Wars universe!) Joel Edgerton. And slightly less interestingly, Michael Shannon and Kirsten Dunst. Plus it has the writer and director of Mud, which I absolutely adored. I love me some sci-fi, so the plot does actually seem intriguing too, and reviews are pretty positive, so I just may be giving this one a watch sometime!
The Little Prince
Mar 18th(limited); PG
This one's been a long time coming, but is finally almost here. This trailer is pretty spectacular, and the cast is large and talented, and I expect it'll be a very well-received movie. It looks great, I'll be very surprised if it isn't, and I'm definitely planning to want to see it for myself.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Mar 25th; PG-13
Do you have any idea of how hard it was for me to not type "Bateman vs. Superbman" just then? It was a struggle. At least I got it out of my system now. So Henry Cavill is back and Zack Snyder is back, and Ben Affleck's Batman is about to get its debut, and I can't decide what I think. Should I laugh? Cry? Shrug and roll my eyes? Forget about his whole thing and wait for a good hero vs. hero movie to come along -- AKA, Civil War? Funny enough, it actually looks like a decent Batman movie at the beginning of this trailer. Then Supes and Drama and Snyder's infamous action style shows up, and I'm back to rolling my eyes. Anyway, I guess I'm done now. Moving on...
I Saw the Light
Mar 25th(limited); R
Tom Hiddleston has faded a little away from the peak of his popularity, but he's still a talented actor and I imagine he does a fantastic job in this role. I don't think I'd mind watching him in anything even if he does trade in his British accent for a country one that sound like what I hear all the time, and he even sings in this movie to make up for it.... But besides that I have absolutely no interest in this movie whatsoever. It does not look good. And as much as I like Hiddleston, he's not going to be enough to get me to watch this. Ho-hum reviews coming in seem to share my opinion.
Which March movies look interesting to you?
London Has Fallen
Mar 4th; R
Aaron Eckhart and Gerard Butler return as the President of the United Stated and his loyal bodyguard who saved his life in the last film and is gonna do it again. But it London. With higher stakes, I assume. I caught Olympus Has Fallen on TV a while back, and enjoyed it pretty well. Though I thought it was pretty bad, it had a violent, serious appeal, and it was certainly better than White House Down with much more likable leads and its more hardcore vibe. So I wouldn't mind catching this one too someday.
Zootopia
Mar 4th; PG
It's not like I don't want to see this one, but right now I'm super tired of the trailers getting everywhere. Animated Disney movie trailers are seriously the worst things ever. They make this movie look so annoying and are probably giving away all the jokes too. However I have learned to not judge a Disney animation by its trailer, and all the extremely positive reviews coming in are much more convincing that this one may just be a gem. But the sloth jokes are driving me crazy.
The Divergent Series: Allegiant
Mar 18th; PG-13
Uuuuhhhhhh. Is it worth mentioning that Insurgent was so boring that I was basically done with this series as soon as I saw it? First of all, Allegiant was the worst book of the series, and I don't care to see it end on screen. There's no enjoyment for me there, unless some huge changes are made. Secondly, this isn't even the end, because (that's right!) the last book is split into two movies! Yaayyyy... Except no Part1/Part2, now there's an "Ascendant" to look forward to. I'm not saying I'll never see this one or the last one. There is after all, the matter of my curiosity and my favorite character Peter. But seeing it in the theater is a long shot. Almost as a long a shot as this movie breaking the pattern and being a truly good movie!
Midnight Special
Mar 18th; PG-13
I seem to find one every month. One movie that I know noting about but the cast makes me immediately want to see it. This time it's this sci-fi film that want to be like Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and the interesting cast is Adam Driver and (his great uncle in the Star Wars universe!) Joel Edgerton. And slightly less interestingly, Michael Shannon and Kirsten Dunst. Plus it has the writer and director of Mud, which I absolutely adored. I love me some sci-fi, so the plot does actually seem intriguing too, and reviews are pretty positive, so I just may be giving this one a watch sometime!
The Little Prince
Mar 18th(limited); PG
This one's been a long time coming, but is finally almost here. This trailer is pretty spectacular, and the cast is large and talented, and I expect it'll be a very well-received movie. It looks great, I'll be very surprised if it isn't, and I'm definitely planning to want to see it for myself.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
Mar 25th; PG-13
Do you have any idea of how hard it was for me to not type "Bateman vs. Superbman" just then? It was a struggle. At least I got it out of my system now. So Henry Cavill is back and Zack Snyder is back, and Ben Affleck's Batman is about to get its debut, and I can't decide what I think. Should I laugh? Cry? Shrug and roll my eyes? Forget about his whole thing and wait for a good hero vs. hero movie to come along -- AKA, Civil War? Funny enough, it actually looks like a decent Batman movie at the beginning of this trailer. Then Supes and Drama and Snyder's infamous action style shows up, and I'm back to rolling my eyes. Anyway, I guess I'm done now. Moving on...
I Saw the Light
Mar 25th(limited); R
Tom Hiddleston has faded a little away from the peak of his popularity, but he's still a talented actor and I imagine he does a fantastic job in this role. I don't think I'd mind watching him in anything even if he does trade in his British accent for a country one that sound like what I hear all the time, and he even sings in this movie to make up for it.... But besides that I have absolutely no interest in this movie whatsoever. It does not look good. And as much as I like Hiddleston, he's not going to be enough to get me to watch this. Ho-hum reviews coming in seem to share my opinion.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014
Upcoming Movie Roundup -- January
Happy new year everyone! Last month I didn't see anything besides the one movie I couldn't not see -- The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug -- and that one I saw twice. Saving Mr. Banks is patiently awaiting it's turn, which it should get eventually since it's living up to my predictions, and surprisingly my interest in The Secret Life of Walter Mitty has grown slightly due to reading a few reviews praising it for being better than expected.
In the first month of 2014, there's no must-sees like the Hobbit, so if I do get to the theater it'll be more likely for a re-watch of Catching Fire, or to see Frozen, which I am increasingly desperate to see, than for anything like, oh, say, The Legend of Hercules. Yeah right. In fact only three new films have actually hit my radar so far.
The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box
Jan 10th (Limited); PG
This one's rather obscure, but it managed to catch my attention. Firstly, by having the word "adventurer" in the title, and then by being set in the late 1800's. I wouldn't assume it'd turn out to be a great film, or even a good one, but it's exactly the kind of not-great movie I'd like. (Or at least it has the formula for it.) A little research informed me that it's based on a book -- "Mariah Mundi and the Midas Box" (first of three in a series) by G. P. Taylor, whom I have attempted to read before with "The Shadowmancer" but couldn't get into it. But since the Mariah Mundi series is more for kids, and more action-packed, they seem like a great way to give the author another go. So while the film is still interesting, I must say it's mostly just made me interested in the books. If you've read them, I'd love to hear your opinion of them!
I, Frankenstein
Jan 14th; PG-13
This is a similar case as above. I don't expect it to be good (in fact I'd be very surprised if it was) but it does have it's draws. Aaron Eckhart as the lead, for one, and, now since I've recently started (and nearly finished) watching Chuck I see the appeal of Yvonne Strahovski, absolutely. Plus Bill Nighy, and Miranda Otto. The plot, of course, doesn't appear to have anything to do with anything that has anything to do with Frankenstein, except the name (given to the monster instead of the creator), and the stitching. I'm reminded very much of Priest, that super awful and cheesy vampire movie also based on a graphic novel. It was made horrendously, but I enjoyed it, mostly because of Paul Bettany and Karl Urban, and enjoyed laughing at it. If this turns out similarly, I might be very annoyed, because it might make me want to see it.
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
Jan 17th; PG-13
The reboot of Jack Ryan starring Chris Pine! Obviously, this won't be the greatest action flick of all-time or anything, but it certainly looks prepared to deliver some shiny, exciting, and implausible thrills, and that sounds good by me, especially with Pine at the lead, and Kenneth Branagh both directing and making an appearance with a Russian accent as the generic, but fun-looking bad guy. Kevin Costner and Keira Knightly round out the cast, and, even though I am not at all a fan of either of them, I am prepared to give them a chance for the sake of what should be an amusing escapade into the slick land of Action-Adventure. And who knows -- maybe it'll exceed my expectations.
What films do you have your eye on for the beginning of 2014?
In the first month of 2014, there's no must-sees like the Hobbit, so if I do get to the theater it'll be more likely for a re-watch of Catching Fire, or to see Frozen, which I am increasingly desperate to see, than for anything like, oh, say, The Legend of Hercules. Yeah right. In fact only three new films have actually hit my radar so far.
The Adventurer: The Curse of the Midas Box
Jan 10th (Limited); PG
This one's rather obscure, but it managed to catch my attention. Firstly, by having the word "adventurer" in the title, and then by being set in the late 1800's. I wouldn't assume it'd turn out to be a great film, or even a good one, but it's exactly the kind of not-great movie I'd like. (Or at least it has the formula for it.) A little research informed me that it's based on a book -- "Mariah Mundi and the Midas Box" (first of three in a series) by G. P. Taylor, whom I have attempted to read before with "The Shadowmancer" but couldn't get into it. But since the Mariah Mundi series is more for kids, and more action-packed, they seem like a great way to give the author another go. So while the film is still interesting, I must say it's mostly just made me interested in the books. If you've read them, I'd love to hear your opinion of them!
I, Frankenstein
Jan 14th; PG-13
This is a similar case as above. I don't expect it to be good (in fact I'd be very surprised if it was) but it does have it's draws. Aaron Eckhart as the lead, for one, and, now since I've recently started (and nearly finished) watching Chuck I see the appeal of Yvonne Strahovski, absolutely. Plus Bill Nighy, and Miranda Otto. The plot, of course, doesn't appear to have anything to do with anything that has anything to do with Frankenstein, except the name (given to the monster instead of the creator), and the stitching. I'm reminded very much of Priest, that super awful and cheesy vampire movie also based on a graphic novel. It was made horrendously, but I enjoyed it, mostly because of Paul Bettany and Karl Urban, and enjoyed laughing at it. If this turns out similarly, I might be very annoyed, because it might make me want to see it.
Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
Jan 17th; PG-13
The reboot of Jack Ryan starring Chris Pine! Obviously, this won't be the greatest action flick of all-time or anything, but it certainly looks prepared to deliver some shiny, exciting, and implausible thrills, and that sounds good by me, especially with Pine at the lead, and Kenneth Branagh both directing and making an appearance with a Russian accent as the generic, but fun-looking bad guy. Kevin Costner and Keira Knightly round out the cast, and, even though I am not at all a fan of either of them, I am prepared to give them a chance for the sake of what should be an amusing escapade into the slick land of Action-Adventure. And who knows -- maybe it'll exceed my expectations.
What films do you have your eye on for the beginning of 2014?
Monday, August 20, 2012
The Dark Knight Trilogy
(Spoiler warning: they may pop up anywhere… especially at
the end!)
Batman Begins--
The trilogy begins with a ground-breaking idea that
superheroes can be taken seriously, and gives us a totally believable origin story
for one of the world’s most believable superheroes. There are three points to
cover (in my opinion) in order to make a good, complete story, and the first is covered exactly right in this
movie; the hero.
Young Bruce Wayne sees his parents murdered in front of him
and grows into a hate-filled man with his eyes on revenge, whatever the cost. Life-changing
words from the girl he loves and a crime boss change his mind and send Bruce around the world in an
attempt to understand criminals, and what it’s like to have nothing. A mysterious man finds him and offers him a
chance to change and make a change with just a little ninja training and spiritual
guidance. The latter doesn’t exactly stick for Bruce, as he decides he will
never needlessly kill anyone, when it’s required of him to finish his training.
He becomes a League of Shadows drop-out, and returns to Gotham determined to honor
his father, and serve the city, mostly by locking up every criminal he can find.
Using a piece of advice from his mentor - and to protect his loved ones - a
costume is in order, and before you can start to sing “na na na na na…” the
Batman is born.
The majority of Bruce Wayne/Batman’s character development happens
in this movie; at the end he’s a hero, and this movie is about his journey,
from beginning to heroism. And finally it's done right - finally we get to understand Bruce. He’s no longer
stylized, campy, melodramatic, or plain silly; he’s real, and his superhero
status is believable.
The amazing, and visionary director, Christopher Nolan, is of course the person to thank for
this. He knows how to make a movie true to life without tossing out the pleasure
of watching a movie for entertainment. The key appears to be to make it dark; the real
world is a dark place after all. But there is more to it that just that, and
what really impressed me were all the details. Why bats, for an example? “Bats
frighten me,” says Bruce, “it’s time my enemies shared my dread.”
Christian Bale is Batman. He wonderfully embodies the complex
character with powerful subtlety. Previous renditions of the character practically crumble
into nothing, and anyone who may try to take on the role anytime in the near
future would probably be crazy, and therefore would do a bad job of it. And who
else could ever play Alfred but Michael Caine? I mean, come on. Gary Oldman is
perfect as Gordon, a more traditional brand of hero everyone loves to cheer
for. Don’t forget Morgan Freeman as Mr. Fox, and Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes
is lovely, but unfortunately doesn’t last. And the antagonists, Cillian Murphy, and
Liam Neeson, put out their due amount of evil and creepiness
according to their character to satisfaction.
Batman Begins is a classic movie really, starting with a flawed
character in need of change, and ending with that character saving the day and
becoming a new person; a hero. This is done to perfection, but “ending” is the
key word here… there is a good and satisfying end. Batman’s identity as a hero
is established, and the character’s arc is complete, but this is only the first
movie, and we want more, so, what now?
The Dark Knight--
Well, there's two of my three points left to cover, and the
second one is a test. We have to know that the Batman can hold to his morals,
and will never give up on his city no matter how bleak things get. Usually,
this is where a sequel comes out, trying to re-sell the same format of the
first film by putting a different plot on it, and that’s why sequels don’t work…
usually. There’s no worries when Nolan is at the helm. He knows how to make a
sequel that doesn’t feel like a re-hash. The key now is to go even darker, and more intimate, and
bring on a storm of trials to push our hero to his limits. Enter the Joker.
Heath Ledger’s turn as the Joker is very good… very, very
good. Perhaps too good... in a word, convincing… in the highest sense of
the word. We’re not supposed to understand him, and honesty, I don’t want to. And
with his great performance, it’s easy to forget everyone else in the movie, but Bale continues
to be good, despite this movie not being quite as much about his characters
development as the previous one. Maggie Gyllenhaal does a fine job replacing Holmes, and adds spunk
to Rachel. But Aaron Eckhart as Two-Face Harvey Dent is my personal favorite. He holds up very well against the Ledger's overpowering Joker and leaves a heavy impression with a sad and thought-provoking role.
The movie as a whole, in fact, is very thought-provoking, but also
very entertaining, with great action, and real drama; it’s a truly well-done movie
that succeeds on every level it goes to. If you can survive the darkness, the
contrasting light is well worth it. Or just sit back and enjoy the
artistic beauty, or the smart involving script, and stylish action. I always
consider the middle movie of a trilogy to typically be the worst, due to the
difficulty of providing a satisfying beginning and end to the story, but I don’t
have any evidence at all to prove that here. This is the most well-done film in the franchise,
and in my opinion, also has the best ending of the three movies.
I won’t go over plot details here, mostly because I can’t exactly remember them straight, but basically, the Joker raises @#!*% , and destroys lives, and then we watch
the aftermath, and how characters deal with their crumbled worlds. Harvey Dent
begins a good man, but he breaks under pressure and becomes the very thing that destroyed him.
Bruce gets the same treatment, but he somehow hangs on. Broken, but not
defeated Batman maintains his heroism, (to the audience at least) and holds to his morals. He is committed
to doing whatever it takes to save the world. Now we know that for sure. There’s only one thing left now. We
saw the journey to his being a hero, and he scraped through the test at great
personal cost, now all we need is an end.
The Dark Knight Rises--
But we don’t know that. I think I’d be happy to see
more movies about Bruce Wayne beating the odds and defeating evil for as long
as they continue to be good and entertaining, but Nolan knows… yes, he knows a
lot of things… and he knows we need an end. The third point; every story needs an end, and
Nolan has it covered in Rises. It’s got to be hard to end a franchise, but if
you don’t, it will eventually fizzle out anyway, so it’s best to end it sooner,
and end it well. Though, “well” is a rather dull way to describe the way this movie
wrapped up the franchise. “Satisfying,” “amazing” and “epic” are better words
for the job.
Of course, there can’t be just an ending, so this movie
provides a new test for the Dark Knight as well. Eight years later, the Batman
is in hiding, and Bruce turned to a recluse is never seen either, but the fix he
offered up in the last movie stuck, and the city has been a better and cleaner
place. Until Bane shows up, terrorizing the city as he puts his devastating
plan in motion. Bruce is eager become Batman just one more time, and
thinks he’s ready to give his life to save the city, but this time he’s not the
only one willing to give everything to stand against evil.
Commissioner Gordon has always been helpful, but in the Batman’s
absence he steps up, and does all he can to keep the evil at bay, along with newcomer
Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who jumps right in as John Blake, a young, idealistic cop
with spirit, who is this movie's most straight-forward and honest hero. Then
there’s Anne Hathaway, also new, playing Selina Kyle, who has her share of problems, but
does the right and selfless thing when it really counts. I like that these characters
are really focused on and fleshed out as leads along with Bale, and the ensemble feel they
bring to the movie is great.
Played very well by Tom Hardy, Bane is sufficiently evil,
and his composed, boiling rage disturbing. He’s powerful in every way, but thankfully doesn’t overpower any other characters. Marion Cotillard as Miranda Tate is disappointing in the best way possible, with both the
good and bad side played convincingly. Maybe it’s only because I tried to stay
spoiler-free going into this movie, but I thought the plot twists were handled very
well, and weren't too confusing, or unbelievable.
How could anyone doubt that Christopher Nolan knows what he’s
doing? He very successfully wraps up the trilogy with this film, not getting
lazy in any aspect, giving us smart and unique plotting, involving acting from
an all-around stellar cast, and powerful tone. Probably the hardest of the
three movies to do right, but right it definitely is. My only complaint is very small;
that it gets a little slow in the middle, but hey, at two hours and forty-five
minutes, “a little slow” for a few minutes is pretty impressive, especially when you're not making a Lord of the Rings movie.
These three movies are built very differently, yet they fit together
like it had been planned the whole time, and each brings something unique to the table. This dark, thrilling and powerful
trilogy has really set a high standard for movie heroes of a super persuasion, by
succeeding as more than just a superhero movie. It ponders the meaning of
heroism, the effects of evil on society and the individual character, and delves in
deep. It gives us an awesome, breath-taking visual experience, and a dark, chilling,
but ultimately rewarding story, just brimming with thoughtful details. And
finally, it gives us the right conclusion, where good prevails against the dark
and the hero is rewarded for his sacrifice. A hero, a test, and an end… our
Dark Knight delivered and gave us a solid, satisfying conclusion that
resonates. My appreciative thanks go to Nolan, for a deep, exciting, and unique
franchise.
- 4&1/2 of 5 stars, for each movie.
Hello, John Blake franchise?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







