Upcoming Film - The Great Gatsby is going to be a movie... again.
Tom Hiddleston as F. Scott Fitzgerald in Midnight in Paris.
So I recently read The Great Gatsby for the first time. It
was after watching the trailer for the movie, coming in 2013. The trailer piqued
my interest, and then I saw the book was relatively short, and even looked easy
to read. So I read it. And I loved it. I loved the simplicity of the plot, the
wit, the imagery, and the first person writing. I imagined Fitzgerald as Tom Hiddleston, writing
all those witty lines for my entertainment. It was a lovely, pretty short read, and
now, of course, I’m ready for the movie. Because what’s the point of such a
great book if it’s not going to be made into a movie?
I assume that the one and only reason this is being made into a
movie again is so Carey Mulligan can play Daisy Buchanan. She is obviously the
only person who should ever do it; she’s perfect for it. I heard Daisy’s very
specific voice effortlessly as I read, and it sounded exactly like Mulligan. I’m
excited to see her, but what about the rest of the cast? Well, here come my
opinions, ready or not.
Carey Mulligan looking lovely as Daisy from the trailer.
I will never complain about seeing Joel Edgerton in a movie,
and I think he is very well cast here as Tom Buchanan. As I read the book, I forgot
Edgerton was going to be staring, but I knew there was someone I was
forgetting from the cast. I didn’t look it up though, because I wanted to keep my imagination
untainted. Ironically, I imagined Tom to look rather like Tom Hardy, whom Edgerton
played a brother to in Warrior.
Tom Hardy and Joel Edgerton in Warrior.
I was this close to unknowingly imagining the character as
the person actually going to play him. When I finished the book and looked at the
cast list again I had a pretty good chuckle. And then I was very happy of course.
Obviously, Edgerton will be great.
Tobey Maguire’s look as Nick from the trailer stuck with me
pretty well, but one thing about him worries me... Maguire’s usual characters
are at least slightly awkward, especially in the way he talks, but Nick wasn’t
like that; he was more normal, laid back and observing; like the audience or
reader in character form. Tobey Maguire is not the person I would think of for
this role, but he if does it right… i.e. if he leaves all things “Peter Parker”
behind, this role has the potential to be my absolute favorite of his.
Here Maguire is wondering if he should play the character to my liking, or not. Please do!
(I noticed people suggesting Joseph Gordon-Levitt for Nick, and I
think he would've been amazing, but I am heavily biased on that particular subject.)
And finally the main guy, Gatsby himself. And I don’t know
what to say. The fact is I'm having a hard time seeing DiCaprio as Gatsby. He’s a great
actor and I have no doubt he can perform it well – he does play insecure,
desperate characters exceptionally – but he just doesn’t seem quite right. His
voice is wrong, his looks aren’t classic enough... I guess I
just can’t hear DiCaprio say “old sport” and not have it come out funny – in a
bad way. I’m pretty sure my worries will be proven wrong in the end though, and
he’ll be a fine Gatsby.
See? He looks fine. I should relax, right?
No one really jumps out at me as being better for the role
than DiCaprio anyway. Certainly no American actors, but is that important?
Mulligan and Edgerton are British and Australian respectively, and the
newcomer playing Jordan is also an Aussie, and I’m sure an American accent is
no problem for them. If I think British, Cary Elwes comes to mind, and he naturally
has some of Gatsby’s qualities… if only he were twenty or so years younger. Jude
Law is also an interesting thought, and he has the air, and also the acting chops
for the role. If it were up to me to cast the film, he’d probably be my pick,
but alas, I’m just a consumer and must be satisfied with DiCaprio, and as I
said I’m sure he’ll be fine, at least.
A very young Cary Elwes, and...
Jude Law looking very dapper.
This book is in need of a successful film, and the trailer
looks promising, and faithful to the source material, if a little modernized feeling.
It’s going to be in 3D, which is odd, but if it’s quality 3D, I won’t complain,
and who knows, it might even be improved by it. Visuals seem to play a big role
here if you can judge by the trailer, and 3D was made for big visual movies. I’m
excited to see it, then remember my opinions on it from now, and see how they've
changed. And now that I have stated my opinions, I will move on and get excited
for different movies, like the first installment of The Hobbit, and wait
patiently for May 10.
Looks promising now - we'll see for sure in eight months.
No comments:
Post a Comment